On Making History Out of Mythology - vice versa

Why is reading an important aspect of life? Is reading merely a pleasurable activity? How about those people who flourished before the emergence of cuneiform and hieroglyphic writing? Were they ignorant of reading?

Reading is not an eye-word movement only, but also an eye-human body movement and/or and eye-nature movement. Reading is understanding what you intend to know, but don't be deceived. Your eyes might not give you the exact details of what you are looking for.

Mythology of Homer is quite interesting to read and reread, but we have to review and meticulously compare his details to the details of other poets of his time. He might have flourished during the 8th century. We have to take note of the physique of him also.

Making history out of mythology or making mythology the history is an aspect of literature called legend to few, but it is a sad thing to think that there are nonfictional writers who personify the nonexistent into an existent being. The multiplicity of humanized gods and goddesses are nonexistent inasmuch as you cannot touch them in person. Anyway, the Bible contains histories but are accepted only to those who are given the opportunity to know the exact details of every seeming contradictions as other commentors professed. The Bible is mythology to those who are blinded by the chaotic adviser of this world.

In my opinion, it is an obligation of everyone, whether lazy or not, whether good doer or bad doer, to scrutinize everything that encounters or approaches.

Mythology is an aspect of personal expression to share, if not with peer thinkers, with them who shall have the opportunity to read and evaluate the message of the material being read. History might contain mythological aspect of expression, but beware to pick them up or else you might be making mythical history and/or historical mythology.